Join Email List | About Us | AMERICAblog News
More about: DADT | DOMA | ENDA | Immigration | Marriage | 2012 Elections

9th circuit appears to uphold freeze on DADT discharges, investigations

| Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Notice of Docket Activity

The following transaction was entered on 07/22/2011 at 4:48:31 PM PDT and
filed on 07/22/2011
Case Name: Log Cabin Republicans v. USA, et al
Case Number: 10-56634

Docket Text:

Filed order (ALEX KOZINSKI, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and RICHARD A. PAEZ) The government's emergency motion for reconsideration of this court's July 6, 2011, order lifting the stay entered November 1, 2010, is granted. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10(a)(3). This court's July 6, 2011, order is withdrawn except with respect to (a) the substitution of Leon E. Panetta, Secretary of Defense, as an appellant/cross-appellee and (b) the expedited calendaring of oral argument. The motion of Log Cabin Republicans to lift this court's November 1, 2010, stay of the district court's judgment pending appeal is granted in part. See Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 776 (1987) (stating standard); Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1135 (9th Cir. 2011) (same). The circumstances have changed since November 1, 2010, and the standard for issuance of a stay is demanding. In its briefs, the government does not contend that 10 U.S.C. § 654 is constitutional. In addition, in the context of the Defense of Marriage Act, 1 U.S.C. § 7, the United States has recently taken the position that classifications based on sexual orientation should be subjected to heightened scrutiny. See Golinski v. U.S. Office of Pers. Mgmt., No. C 3:10-00257-JSW (N.D. Cal.) (Doc. 145, July 1, 2011) ("gay and lesbian individuals have suffered a long and significant history of purposeful discrimination"); Letter from Attorney General to Speaker of House of Representatives (Feb. 23, 2011) ("there is, regrettably, a significant history of purposeful discrimination against gay and lesbian people, by governmental as well as private entities"). The government states that the process of repealing Section 654 pursuant to the Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111-322, 124 Stat. 3516 (Dec. 22, 2010), is almost complete. The President, the Secretary of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff have now certified that the implementation of repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell is consistent with the standards of military readiness, military effectiveness, unit cohesion, and recruiting and retention of the armed forces. In addition, the government represents that only one servicemember has been discharged under Section 654 since the passage of the Repeal Act. After consideration of the government's likelihood of success on the merits, the likelihood of irreparable harm, the balance of hardships, and the public interest, we conclude that the stay entered November 1, 2010, shall remain in place in all respects save the following. The district court's judgment shall continue in effect insofar as it enjoins the government from investigating, penalizing, or discharging anyone from the military pursuant to the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy. Briefing is completed. [7830718] [10-56634, 10-56813] (KD) [emphasis added]

blog comments powered by Disqus